Free tool
AI Stack Builder
Claude Code, OpenClaw, Hermes, Microsoft Scout, Manus, or a custom build. Too many choices. Answer four questions and get a ranked stack for your business, with no hype.
Question 1 of 4
How hands-on do you want to be?
The stack, side by side
| Tool | Best for | How hands-on | Who runs it | Data control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | Controlled client work and custom delivery systems | You drive it | You, even non-technical | Strong, sandboxed |
| OpenClaw | Breadth and a huge skill library, fast to deploy | Runs on its own | You, if you can secure it | Weak by default, needs hardening |
| Hermes | Learning your repeat workflows, with memory | Runs on its own | Technical, self-hosted | Model-agnostic, you own the engine |
| Microsoft Scout | Autonomy wrapped in enterprise governance | Runs on its own | Managed, on the Microsoft estate | Enterprise identity and policy |
| Manus | Hosted, hands-off general autonomy | Runs on its own | Fully managed, nothing to host | Hosted service, less in your hands |
| Custom (Next.js + Supabase) | Shipping a product, not just an assistant | You build the behaviour | You or a developer | You own the whole stack |
Security is the deciding factor when you hold client data. For most consultants the answer is Claude Code plus one or two workflows, not a raw open-source agent. The deeper compare is in OpenClaw vs Hermes vs Claude Code.
